It’s been a big month for news about personalized news (and February isn’t even half over). You’d think a startup like DailyMe with several years invested in building and evolving its Newstogram platform for dynamic personalization would want to keep the space to itself, but we’re excited that so many others are deciding to enter the fray. It validates the importance of delivering personally relevant news experiences to each user in a digital world and it demonstrates the power of participating in our network approach vs. the cost and effort of building a standalone system yourself.

Among the latest to announce or launch personalized news products:

The New York Times quietly rolled out a page of “Articles Recommended for You.” So far, I haven’t seen any promotion of it on the main site, just news coverage of it. If you visit the page, you’ll need to log in, view several articles and wait a day for recommendations to appear. My experience has been that most of the recommendations are on target with my interests, but today’s top pick was “Museum and Gallery Listings” even though my interests displayed on the right were all technology, business and sports related, with not a hint of arts. Perhaps that’s why it’s still kept low key.

The Washington Post let out some details of a new site called Trove, though it’s still in private beta and supposedly won’t launch until next month. Coverage in The Wall Street Journal noted: “Media executives say the holy grail of online news is a service that tailors the experience to each reader as effectively as sites like Amazon and Pandora do for books and music.” It also noted that “news is more difficult than other products to gear to individual preferences.” I couldn’t agree more. The project reportedly has a development team of 20 people and the company is investing $5 million to $10 million. The article didn’t say if that includes the cost of its purchase iCurrent last year.

A bit more vaporware-ish (launch targeted at “first half of the year”) is the Yahoo! announcement of “Livestand.” The project is described as a publishing platform for mobile devices that will be offered to other publishers as well as present Yahoo! content. Like other efforts, Yahoo! also claims it will be personalized based on the kinds of content you consume, much as the Yahoo! home page is tailored to each user’s interests. While this might work well for Yahoo! content, I’ll be interested to see if other publishers want their articles mixed into a personalized blend of news from different sources or if they prefer to keep their content within a walled garden.

The NYT and Post seem intrigued enough by personalized news that they are hedging their bets on their own efforts and investing in other similar projects. Both are investors in Ongo, a paid iPad app that is both customizable (user must create topics of interest) and ad-free. The Times also spun off a social-stream-based personalization project called News.Me into Betaworks, which is building it out for release soon.

And its not just the big players who are expanding their personalized offerings. My6Sense, which already has a neat iPhone app that tailors your RSS and social feeds using “digital intuition,” announced a Chrome browser extension that uses a similar approach to prioritize your Twitter stream.

If I wake up tomorrow to even more announcements of personalized news products, I guess I won’t think it’s Ground Hog Day all over.

From @neilbudde’s recent blog post over on Newstogram.com

I’ve been using Gmail’s Priority Inbox for a while now and, while I don’t get an overwhelming amount of email, have found it very useful (and increasingly so as it learns even more about what is, and isn’t, important to me). 

Recently, when I was describing what Newstogram does for news and current information sites, someone said “so you’re basically like Priority Inbox for news”. 

I hadn’t thought about it like that but, at his suggestion, I watched the video for Priority Inbox (embedded above) and can clearly see the parallels. In fact we could basically reuse several quotes from the video just by replacing “messages” with “news articles” and “Google” with “Newstogram”:  

Wouldn’t it be nice to know which news articles to focus on first

Newstogram finds the important news articles and sorts them for you

What is really neat… Newstogram is great at predicting what is important 

So… we need to get publishers using Newstogram to its full potential so their news and current information sites are as useful as Priority Inbox. 

There will always be a place for mass marketing, but in the next three- to five-years, a website that isn’t tailored to a specific user’s interest will be an anachronism

—Facebook COO Sheryl Sandberg, speaking to Arianna Huffington at an Advertising Week event earlier this week (Full report at PaidContent).

I totally agree with Sandberg’s premise. I also think her timing is probably about right. While the technology to deliver a site that is tailored to a user’s interests already exists (whether through Facebook’s Instant Personalization or DailyMe’s Newstogram solution), publishers seem to be taking a ‘slowly, slowly’ approach to letting personalization power a significant part of their sites.

The news feed I’m reading should also be intelligent enough to know what I’ve already read that day and what I haven’t. It should factor in stories my friends recommend and what’s being discussed on my social networks. Most important, these systems should do this without my having to instruct them or tell them anything.
Sounds like the news feed from Nick Bilton’s “I Live in the Future & Here’s How It Works” (see NYTimes review here) is powered by Newstogram.

Neil Budde on the personalized news ‘nut’

My colleague Neil Budde wrote a great post on the Newstogram blog today.

It’s so good I decided to reblog the entire post below, but you should still head over to the Newstogram blog if you want to join the discussion.

We’ve cracked the nut and it’s not even close to 2015

“Delivering news digitally in a personalized manner is a nut many a startup – as well as many established Internet companies and publishers – are desperately trying to crack.”

That’s the way TechCrunch began an article this week about another company entering the personalized news arena. Earlier in the week, we learned that The Washington Post Co. had purchased personalized news venture iCurrent. A week or so earlier, Google News rolled out some modest customization features.

Clearly, the field of personalized news is getting hot. Which makes us glad that DailyMe and our Newstogram platform have a three-year headstart and a unique approach. We’re not desperately trying to crack the nut, we have the nut cracked and are rolling Newstogram out on a range of news and information sites.

Personalization of news has been kicked around for a while. MIT Media Lab founder Nicholas Negroponte described a virtual daily newspaper customized for an individual’s tastes in his 1995 book, “Being Digital.” He called it The Daily Me, a term we later adopted for our company, though he has nothing to do with DailyMe Inc.

In a commentary written for The Wall Street Journal last December, Google CEO Eric Schmidt described a device for news that “knows who I am, what I like, and what I have already read. So while I get all the news and comment, I also see stories tailored for my interests.” In his article, Schmidt imagined such a device being available in 2015.

In our view, 2015 is already here.

Newstogram already is serving up personalized news to users of sites like Variety.com and Impre.com and through several modules on DailyMe.com. Our approach of tracking and analyzing the content users consume and using the resulting individual interest profiles to make recommendations has outperformed other approaches in tests and we continue to improve and refine our algorithms.

We welcome the additional interest in news personalization, because it only serves to highlight our position as the leader in the field.

We value our audience above all else. The ability to now offer a highly personalized experience on our site is critical to meeting consumer needs. By implementing Newstogram™, we have a detailed understanding of our user’s interests and a better way to present content that promotes site engagement. The news industry is changing, and new technologies like Newstogram are going to keep us ahead.

Monica Lozano, CEO of ImpreMedia

Exciting news! ImpreMedia, the nation’s No.1 Spanish-language online and print news publisher, announced today that they have rolled out our Newstogram recommendation technology to generate data on their user’s interests and deliver visitors personalized content, advertisements and e-commerce opportunities.

You can see Newstogram in action on La Opinion, El Diario and other ImpreMedia sites.

The full press release is available here.

We’re looking for some algorithmic ninjas

DailyMe is recruiting for two Data / Research Scientists - role is advertised here on KDNuggets, as well as on LinkedIn.

The Data / Research Scientists will support DailyMe’s Chief Scientist and I as we seek to further improve the already impressive performance of our Newstogram recommendation system.

User control in the age of data deluge

The Economist had an interesting article this week on the data deluge, in which it argued that, to help users feel like they retain control over their online data, sites need to make more data available to their users:

First, users should be given greater access to and control over the information held about them, including whom it is shared with.


I totally agree that sites should provide greater transparency with respect to tracking and data collection / storage. The Economist highlights Google which allows its users to see what information Google holds about them, and lets them delete search histories or modify the targeting of advertising.

Other sites are increasingly doing this too. For instance, I really like how the Newstogram technology has been implemented on DailyMe.com with a dedicated “My Newstogram” page which shows me what data the site is stored about me, explains how the data will and will not be used, and gives me the ability to correct the data or to opt out of tracking altogether.

Yahoo has similar functionality available through its Ad Interest Manager page (although Yahoo is either tracking a lot less about me or is not as good at determining my interests as they only have me pegged as a generic sports fan).

Stacked graph update

December is a tough time of the year to get anything done and I now realize that my plan to develop stacked graph visualizations of Newstogram data (which required learning a new programming language) was overly optimistic.

I’ve pushed this out to 2010 but to keep me motivated I have added two stacked graph visualizations to my data wall:

1. Visualization of my Last.fm listening history (full PDF)





2. Visualization of my Twitter stream

New visualization challenge: Stacked graphs

The feedback on my tree map visualization was very insightful. Colleagues pointed out that, while interesting, the tree map suffered from the same problem as my other attempts to visualize the Newstogram data: namely it doesn’t address the time dimension. While tree maps and other ‘static’ visualizations (such as bar charts) can display data over a number of different time periods, they don’t really show how the data is changing over time. In the case of many data sets, including the ‘news interest’ data we are tracking through Newstogram, this is the most interesting aspect of the data.

A possible solution is to use a stacked graph visualization. Stacked graphs have been used to visualize a number of data sets including movie revenues, music listening habits, twitter posts, baby names and how people spend their time. So, armed with Lee Byron’s Streamgraph whitepaper, my latest visualization project is to display Newstogram data in a stacked graph.